Sukhoi member has Russian air-conditioned Mogo-funktsional'ny Frontovoy Istrebitel '(MFI - The frontal fighter charts) is simply known to its rival Mikoyan head 1.42. Vladimir Ilyushin, a Sukhoi testing pilot, reported in 1997 that the plane "was about to be eliminated", added that it would be "a sensation around the world" when it was opened. Scarce information on the new fighter Simonov show that it was already a taxi tests at the end of the summer and made its first flight at Zhukovsky at September 25, 1997, in the hands of Sukhoi test pilot Igor Votintsev.
What is the name?
S-32 (offline and Su-32!) The internal default QC code OKB is measured in terms of commonly used but contradictory terms based on Sukhoi Su-7 and Su-9. These designated S-1 and T-1, respectively, with "S" for the first wing against the Russian "Strelovidnoe krylo" and "T" from the Russian for the delta wing "Treugol'noe krylo". Obviously, the "S" on S-32 means that the new Sukhoe has wing but the index is opposed to another S-32 taken by Sukhoi Su-17 a few years ago. There are bigger plans called S-32 as a prize and yet a unique dictionary is used in conjunction with the new Sukhoi fighter - S-37 (not with Su-37!). -S 37 index that was allocated to one of Ned lightweight multirole combat aircraft broadly similar to French Rafal which was canceled in 1994. In any case, both the S-32 and S-37 are the internal bureau title, and he su- Whatever. The reported S-37 name is Berergkut (Ber-koot), which is a Russian golden eagle. The NATO airline reporting name is "Firkin".
From the Tailless Canard to Tandem Triplane
The fifth Generic Flood covers the best wings (FSW), pulls and certified twins and integrates small visual technologies and thrust-vectoring. A comparison of a photo of the top of the model the first model and drawings of consideration and publication of musicians, which is in the western printing press, it is clear that the wing of the S-leading 37 in combination with near kwamadonsa. However, the plane keeps up-to-date enhancements, from a clean dinner to the tribal triplane building. The first S-37 images show that the stabilizer is thoroughly cleaned (ca 70 deg) and their best edges seem to increase aft at FSW's wing root. This is very different from the X-29A strakes that were striped root particles that end up with the top flags.
The tandem triplane repairs were a 1985 T-10-24 test that served as the other Marine Flanker. In addition to the canards, referred to where you in Russian (Perednee Gorizontal'noe Operenie - Forward horizontal stabilizers), solved the control problems encountered at the angle-of-attack is high (AOA) flight kingdoms where tailerons lost the use of their wing. PGO seems to be the favorite of the highest generation and half of the 34s, -32FN, -35 and Su-37 and the fifth generation S-37 and S-54.
Although the basis for S-37 remains unclear, some sources suggested that the first order and was much closer to X-29a footnote scheme and aerodynamic first S-37 directly benefited Central Aerohydrodynamics Institute (TsAGI) wind-tunnel tests to forecast 29a model Model. It is possible that the 32-year-old technical director, who was designed to test FSW aerodynamics and opposition agencies of the organism, may have started his life as another, but 90% of what happened is Simonov's urging him to take this project one step in trying to introduce the S32 as real warriors of the generation The fifth is demanded by the Russian force force. This may explain the fact that the S-32 seems to be extremely difficult in the study table, being an aircraft larger than the Northrop F-5 size X-29A.
In fact, S-37 is in the classroom of Su-27 as it is compared to comparing its scale model to the Su-27 Flanker high model presented at the same meeting. Moscow Aerospace (MAKS 97) provided additional data on S-37 and confirmed that the S-37 triling, operating and planning of the trip is similar to that of Su-37. The first S-37 public images suggest that the fuselage part of the fuselage with a "LXX" codra may appear on the dozen S-37 delta. If it is true, this may seem clear from the source of the S-37 index.
The front wing
The first Soviet designs to incorporate the equilibrium wing was Belyaev's DB-LK and Babochka and Miziyan Gurevitch PBSh-2 (MiG-6) plane plane. Captive captivity-1, -2 and3 directly, climbing and moving on the wings openly respectively (40 degrees). LL-1 and LL-3 rocket powered gliders make a powerful airline and provide TSAGI with the necessary FSW information. One of the LL-3 flights reached Mak 0.97 in the fishing industry. Fifth Fifth generation of Fighter Philosophy FSW is the best player in the post-stall attack that is most important for dog learning. The fact that Simonov had chosen FSW because his fifth battle also confirmed the Sukhoi commitment to this super script as a requirement is important for the next generation of air-high fighter. This approach, in sharp contrast to the western stealth views, the supercruise and the BVR engagement, are taken from the Su-37 border. The FSW S-32 dedicated to the TVC is expected to succeed in its focus on the integration of dogs involved in the aircraft industry. Since there is a direct limit, S-32 clearly captures the US and European fighters-generation generation. But even with its internal arm and RAM cap, the new Sukhoi is a very different idea than F-22. A difficult RAM dictionary rather than radar (RAS) structures obviously. The reason for that attitude is unclear, although technology integration with technical expertise and the teaching of work is probably possible. Major components of radar stealth - high quality RAM and superior quality - are combined with the tolerance of production and maintenance as indicated by the performance of USAF F-117 and B-2. Screws, scratches or open-air panels are not known to have severely damaged the aircraft RCS, by reducing the aircraft designs installed on the design of the aircraft. It's always seen how the Sukhoi will overcome the standards of production of Russian aircraft programs. Afghanistan also where Sukhoi's encountered a shoulder line launched infrared homing face-to-air burning missiles such as Redeye, Stinger and SA-7, forced by the Sukhoi team to work down the infrared signature of Su-25. Results have been made in developing Su-25T - Scheme 25TM (Su-39 in Stage). The ingestion of digestive drops to cover turbine blades and the effective mixing of cooling winds reduce the IR signal of the Frogfoot from the front and back sides. The minimum reduction of 2% low cost SFC costs is a great success. Continuous tests and low visibility are involved in upgrading Flanker development, 700 aircraft (Su-35, -37) and 600 (Su-30) series. These farmers are wearing new eye-catching techniques that can be found to minimize the visual signature of aircraft in the ground and in the sky. One of the most fascinating examples of the Sukhoe test was the principle used at 701, designed to trick the open-minded space systems. Another effort was aimed at reducing the main components of the Larger Plans radar. Su-34, -32FN has been used in randomized random radar, does not have a variable geometry made and reported to have a slight RAM revating. Sukhoi soon states that the basic su-30MK submission models can not be complied with RAM to satisfy customers' low demand for the lowest RCS. The explicit discovery of previous studies, S-37 is largely dependent on Sukhoi's visual visual appearance. The player has a wing, a conformal overlaying machine on the channel (s), RAM usage and internal canted tailfins, suggesting further reduction in tax signatures for radar flights down from the same 3-5 m Flanker's sq. The extension of the IR-S-37 IR signal signature will depend on the selection of trust vectoring. The 2D spinning FD 22 type can provide better results while the 2D bridge may contradict the best Simonov ideas that make 3D discharged. Saturn-Lulka reported the reduction of IR signature axi-screened Vector controlled TV (TVC) Al-37FU plant power in non-afterburning kingdoms. Powerplant Availability is a lack of trust vectoring Saturn-Lulka Al-41F elements for the Mikoyan's article 1.42 forced Sukhoi to find the location of the powerplant initially planned. According to the MAPO MIG sources, a limited number of Al-41Fs involved in an examination of Article 1.42 of Mikoyan and is not available for the Sukhoi competition. The MIG Mountaineering MIG makes control of the hope-vectoring (TVC) Al-37FU (sometimes referred to as Al-31FU when FU represents Forsazh, Upravlaemoye soplo - afterburning, mouth mouthscreen) Powerplant used by Sukhoi's Su-37 to naturally select the fifth- But it was not yet lateIn manual mode the nozzle deflection angle is set by the pilot, and in automatic mode the axi-symmetric nozzles are controlled by the MNPK Avionika full-authority, digital fly-by-wire flight control system (FCS). The movable in pitch axis nozzle deflects ±15 degree at 30 deg/s by a pair of hydraulic jacks. The production Al-37FU will use jet fuel instead of hydraulic liquid to drive the nozzles. Surprisingly, as a temporal solution, instead of similar and widely available Su-27 Flanker's Al-31F powerplants, the S-32 prototype received a pair of Perm Aviadvigatel D-30F6 engines used on MiG-31 Foxhound interceptors. Designed by the 1980, this full authority digital engine control (FADEC) engine comprises six interchangeable modules and a core module. Although powerplant accumulated several thousand flight hours and experienced no operational drawbacks, it has estimated 300 hrs life between overhauls (Russian engine maintenance is very different from western philosophy and term "overhauls" has a different meaning). There were no reports on TVC versions of D-30F6. The photographs of S-37 Berkut, show two details: the starboard tail sting is slightly longer than the port one and the two auxiliary intakes on the top of the fuselage. There are three reasonable explanations to the sting asymmetry: a) it houses a breaking or a spin recovery shute b) it is due to the asymmetric engine installation typical for prototypes.
designs
The port engine will be used to test a 3D TVC nozzle which will require adequate space for the yaw vectoring c) Sukhoi used two 2D nozzles oriented perpendicular to each other to control pitch and yaw separately. Combined action give a pseudo 3D effect. This last explanation is least likely since Lulka reported to have 3D TVC nozzle "in the pocket" at the time of Farnborough 96. Auxiliary intakes could be used during take offs for increased air flow to the engines. These could have been repositioned from the underside of the aircraft due to the reduces radar cross section considerations or/and lack of the space taken by internal missile bay(s). Avionics In early September, defence-ministry acquisition chief Col Gen Anatoly Sitnov noted: "What is the use of developing the Sukhoi fifth-generation fighter, if the aircraft's cockpit dates back to a second- or third-generation design?" While Sitnov statement clearly implying the state of the art of the S-32, one can hardly expect that a first test airframe will incorporate all innovations planned for the series production. Similarly, the sole Su-37 demonstrator flies with a counterweight instead of the advanced radar hence the aircraft is intended to explore among other things the trust vectoring modes of the new powerplant. However, the Su-37 fighter will have the top notch avionics suit which is tested on other 700 series airframes -- Sukhoi Su-35s. It is expected that the sophistication of S-32 cockpit and avionics suit should at least match that of forth-and-a-half generation Su-35 and Su-37 aircraft. The cockpit of the S-32 does most certainly feature the color liquid crystal MFDs and wide angle HUD. The test proven in Su-37 demonstrator inclined pilot seat, a fixed pressure sensitive throttle and side-stick controller will also find its way to the cockpit of new fighter expected to impose even greater G-loads on pilot than superagile Su-37. The type of the radar intended for S-32 is not known. The size of the random seems to be somewhat smaller than that of Su-27 family, possibly implying the smaller diameter antenna. Since the S-32 lacks the Flanker's sting, the placement of the rearward facing radar will be challenging at best. Armament The armament of the S-32 will most likely never get close to the air-to-air arsenal of Mikoyan's article 1.42, enjoying super long range K-37. However the ram jet version of AA-12 Adder, R-77PD (RVV-AE-PD), seems to be the most appropriate long stick for the new fighter. The missile's collapsible lattice stabilizers give R-77 family the compactness well suited for the internal weapon bay(s) of the stealth S-32. However, the aerodynamically superior lattice stabilizers have reportedly a much greater RCS than conventional surfaces, thus potentially revealing the position of the aircraft at the moment of the missile launch. The exact number of weapon bays is not known, although the total number of the hardpoints will be fourteen. The use of the internal/external weapon loads will depend on the mission.
No comments:
Post a Comment